Founded in 2014 by former Britam executives Edwin Dande, Elizabeth Nkukuu, and Patricia Wanjama, Cytonn Investments positioned itself as a cutting-edge private equity and real estate firm. With slick marketing campaigns and promises of high returns, it quickly attracted thousands of investors. The firm’s branding—inviting people to become “Cytonnaires”—was aspirational, seductive, and ultimately deceptive.
Cytonn’s flagship developments like The Alma, Taraji Heights, and Riverrun were showcased as proof of success, while behind the scenes, the company was defaulting on payouts and shielding assets through opaque legal structures.
Cytonn offered two similarly named products:
This naming strategy misled many investors into believing both products were safe. CHYS promised up to 18% annual returns, drawing in over 4,000 investors and raising more than Sh11.1 billion. Cytonn Project Notes (CPN) raised an additional Sh4.1 billion from 886 investors.
However, investors were issued loan notes—not equity—meaning they had no legal claim to the real estate assets when defaults began.
By 2020, Cytonn began defaulting on payments. The firm blamed illiquid real estate assets, but refused to sell or initiate buybacks, raising suspicions of deeper financial mismanagement. Despite mounting investor complaints and regulatory scrutiny, CEO Edwin Dande continued to lure new clients—even as thousands were already trapped in defaulted schemes.
Investigations revealed a maze of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), most 99% owned by Cytonn and 1% by Dande or close associates. This structure allowed centralized control and raised serious concerns about transparency and conflicts of interest. Cytonn’s use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) allowed it to collect investor funds through CPN and lend them to real estate projects via loan notes—making it nearly impossible for investors to claim ownership or force asset sales.
During a liquidation dispute over The Alma, armed guards reportedly blocked court-appointed liquidators from accessing the property. The standoff involved threats, intimidation, and a dramatic clash over title deeds. This incident underscored the murky ownership structures and the lengths to which Cytonn insiders would go to protect their interests.
The Supreme Court of Kenya dismissed an appeal by Dande, Nkukuu, and Wanjama, paving the way for their criminal trial over alleged theft of Sh1 billion from Britam Asset Managers. The court ruled that they must face charges in the Chief Magistrate’s Court and challenge the evidence during trial.
The High Court ordered the liquidation of Cytonn’s real estate arm, rejecting attempts to extend the term of its administrator. Justice Alfred Mabeya criticized the administrator’s cozy relationship with Cytonn insiders. The court also ruled in favor of individual investors like Esther Wangui, who won a Sh2 million payout after arbitration.
Social media platforms like Facebook have become rallying points for victims, with Nation Media’s post about Dande’s continued client recruitment drawing hundreds of angry comments. Many called for criminal charges, asset freezes, and government intervention.
Despite court rulings, liquidation orders, and widespread media exposure, Cytonn continues to solicit and lure unsuspecting investors into its ever-changing con game. The firm frequently rebrands its offerings, shifts investment vehicles, and uses legal technicalities to evade accountability. This persistent behavior highlights the urgent need for regulatory enforcement and public vigilance.